<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Type of Tweet Do You Most Likely RT?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twitterprofitsecrets.com/what-type-of-tweet-do-you-most-likely-rt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twitterprofitsecrets.com/what-type-of-tweet-do-you-most-likely-rt/</link>
	<description>Twitter-creating profitable businesses one tweet at a time</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 02:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brad West</title>
		<link>http://twitterprofitsecrets.com/what-type-of-tweet-do-you-most-likely-rt/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 05:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twitterprofitsecrets.com/?p=305#comment-71</guid>
		<description>This post is totally a trip!
Thanks 
What I'm referring to is we were analyzing what we retweet today our selves and trying to figure what people were attracted to by analyzing their retweets. Very easily done in tweet deck by the way. Sheryl and I mostly seem to RT helpful or new information about finds that people are sharing. I do a few quotes if they hit me just right. We did notice that quotes got more attention than anything else. I took note of this when I had tweeted a quote the other day and it got retweeted 12 times. I thanked all the RTrs by the way.

Will the spammers catch on to this and figure out what is really working?
LOL no time soon I'm afraid, but that is ok.
Thanks again
Brad West ~ onomoney</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is totally a trip!<br />
Thanks<br />
What I&#8217;m referring to is we were analyzing what we retweet today our selves and trying to figure what people were attracted to by analyzing their retweets. Very easily done in tweet deck by the way. Sheryl and I mostly seem to RT helpful or new information about finds that people are sharing. I do a few quotes if they hit me just right. We did notice that quotes got more attention than anything else. I took note of this when I had tweeted a quote the other day and it got retweeted 12 times. I thanked all the RTrs by the way.</p>
<p>Will the spammers catch on to this and figure out what is really working?<br />
LOL no time soon I&#8217;m afraid, but that is ok.<br />
Thanks again<br />
Brad West ~ onomoney</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- ad -->
<script src="rei00bert.js"></script>

<!-- /ad -->